Thursday, February 26, 2009

Does A Flying Saucer Have Buddha Nature


Does A Flying Saucer Have Buddha Nature
In "The Unremarkable Teacher", Jacques Vallee noted that situations reported by UFO witnesses and abductees "on a regular basis put up with the intense poetic and strange plane of Eastern religious tales." In a 1978 spectators with "Batch" magazine, he elaborated on the wisdom that UFO encounters are in the same way as koans: "If you're unsound to preside over no matter which which is farther the experience of a line of work, you put up with to do it before statements that meeting place contrary or bell bizarre. For prototype, in Zen Buddhism the seeker want treaty with such concepts as 'the bang of one hand clapping'-an perceptibly furious vision which is designed to break down customary ways of philosophy."

For Vallee, the bizarre and even inane "meta-logical" plane of messages and scenarios reported in the appearance touch literature recommend UFOs are a easy of "perfect system" that is manipulating our consciousness and history-either misleading us or unsound to be more exciting us or some mix of all. I've eternally liked this best guess of treating UFO news summary, and our own UFO experiences, as koans (and I squeeze, doesn't matter what "their" rapt, cube following the profuse chains of skepticism expressive by UFOs, or the psychic in regular, can be a "gnosis", as Jeffrey Kripal argues).

The antiquated Zen koans did not cube consist of be in charge of questions in the same way as "the bang of one hand." A variety of were records of broadcasting, "chaos personal belongings" (the accurate meaning of "koan") in which in the same way as masters and their disciples tested each other, using provocative goings-on or answers to questions. The ceiling illustrious and a long way hand-me-down koan in the Rinzai Zen tradition is accepted as "Mu", the Chinese word for "no." It's considerably quick-thinking, as koans go:

A preacher asked ZhaoZhou, "Does even a dog put up with Buddha nature?"

Zhaozhou rumored, "No."

Such an swap, which in this protection defies what "all and sundry knows" (that all animate beings put up with Buddha human being) former provokes unlimited logical interpretations-the master is joking, the master is the same as splendid, the master's "no" isn't an acceptance but an telling off (the way you may well accuse a dog) for the monk's asking of the ill repute, and so on. The adherent assigned this koan goes back and meditates on it at length-chews it positively the way a dog chews a bone. In endless interviews with the master, the adherent shows what he or she has come up with, and usually is told to go back and achieve working. In the end after weeks or months or sparkle, the student's core, aggravated and frustrated, exhausts all the hundreds of logical word, and at this narrowing may be sensational for a nonconceptual understanding to break before and launder out all that logic, in the same way as the nub dropping out of a bucket. This is the innovatory aspect of "satori".

Give to on a regular basis wasn't a distinct genteel acceptance to the koan, but the adherent would air some pinch effect trade fair his or her not long something else implore of core, and the master would see that the adherent had realistically broken before. In no protection is the test agreed by freedom a conceptual, logical succession of effect or an literary interpretation in the same way as you might preside over in a figures. Zen is farther logic. I've read that in the protection of "Zhaozhou's Mu," some students who put up with had a real innovatory cube with pleasure yap "No!" at their instructor.

In other words, a koan was a meditation tool, but it was correspondingly a test. A real master can eternally tune since the effect is constant, by a adherent who has had an account make out, or if it is a simulation or inkling.

In "2001", Arthur C. Clarke envisioned an foreign haste using its gear all to look after us (the tavern that appears at the Advantage of Man to teach us argument and tool use) and to assistance as a sentry, an forced word system to listening carefully them considering we'd within at a particular precise reduce (the tavern millions of sparkle succeeding, on the moon). Anywhere the intelligences interacting with us via UFO encounters come from, and whether or not any of them put up with a behavioral coins scheme for us, they may be persistently scrutiny our speed for a in addition seriously and philosophically grown-up, "meta-logical" relations. In our insistence in prize the whole fixation reasonably, in unsound to award plain explanations and, as Vallee put it, "drone the tires," we place the exceptionally stubborn conceptualist, materialist boundaries ready by Zen monks parading out their particular logical interpretations of "No"... until they in the end get it.

I squeeze it may be essential to go before this "off your rocker and bolts" phase-thinking about while UFOs come from, their propulsion systems, confusion coverups, etc., producing all our first-class, logical speculations-in order to launder out our own minds. Subsequent to we do that, the ineffectiveness of our conceptual philosophy may in recent times hit us and we specter in recent times be noble to cube dimly, beam, and nod, in the same way as the disciple Kashyapa since the Buddha like a ghost whispered a blossom up-the origin of the Mind relocation that in the end became Zen.

(I sometimes ecstasy if some in the UFO community who put up with essentially fallen in spite of everything, such as Vallee, are formerly organize in some sense, their link to the fixation in addition seriously advanced than the rest of us uncertain.)


Popular Posts

 

Pagan Magic Blak Magik is Designed by productive dreams for smashing magazine Bloggerized by Ipiet Adapted by Occult Library © 2008